Low Siew Ling

Low Siew Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 92.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Siew Ling has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	10 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Election Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parliamentary Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Tribunal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Employment Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Service Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fair Criticism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Police Investigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Siew Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Siew Ling has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	10 cases	83% of cases	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion(Jul 2013) Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment(Mar 2013) Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC(Oct 2012)
Attorney-General	1 cases	8% of cases	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment(Mar 2013)
Attorney-General Chambers	1 cases	8% of cases	Anwar Siraj v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Orders Against Police and Senior District Judge Dismissed(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Siew Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	112.4 parties avg	2.4	92%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2013	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Siew Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Won	11(92%)	92%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	64,000.00	12,800.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	5 14	Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion 04 Jul 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The court ordered each party to bear their own costs.
2	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment 14 Mar 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $5,000 awarded to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment 13 Mar 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants ordered to pay half the costs of the appeal to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC 31 Oct 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	31 Oct 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; no order as to costs.
5	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Application for Quashing Order Against Chief Justice's Order 28 Jun 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	28 Jun 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed.
6	Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General: Application to Reopen Prior Court of Appeal Decisions 05 Mar 2012 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	05 Mar 2012	Attorney-General (Defendant): Summons DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application to reopen prior Court of Appeal decisions.
7	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Clemency Power 03 Apr 2011 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2011	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
8	Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General: Wrongful Dismissal Claim by Former Land Office Employee 23 Nov 2010 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	23 Nov 2010	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant.
9	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary 15 Nov 2010 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	15 Nov 2010	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantCosts fixed at $55,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court, Scandalizing the Judiciary 02 Nov 2010 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	02 Nov 2010	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantMr. Shadrake found guilty of the offence of contempt by scandalising the court and convicted accordingly.
11	Mohamed Yusoff v Umi Kalsom: Judicial Review of Syariah Court's Matrimonial Property Division 14 Apr 2010 Attorney-General (Other)Neutral	14 Apr 2010	Attorney-General (Other): NeutralNon-party to the application.
12	Anwar Siraj v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Orders Against Police and Senior District Judge Dismissed 07 Feb 2010 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	07 Feb 2010	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for leave to apply for mandatory orders was dismissed. Costs fixed to the Attorney-General at $4,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.