Low Sze Hui Jasmine

Low Sze Hui Jasmine is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and misrepresentation. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Pre-Effective Date Indemnity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Sze Hui Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Sze Hui Jasmine has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute(Jan 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Sze Hui Jasmine's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Sze Hui Jasmine's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute 30 Jan 2023 CFK (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jan 2023	CFK (Plaintiff): Applications dismissed in their entiretyApplications to set aside the Second and Third Partial Awards and to remove the Presiding Arbitrator were dismissed.