Low Tiang Hock

Low Tiang Hock is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and damages. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Persistent Vegetative State	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pain and Suffering	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Tiang Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Tiang Hock has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chor Pee & Partners	3 cases	43% of cases	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim(Apr 2001) Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd: Settlement Agreement & Insurance Claim Dispute(Apr 2001) Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Loss of Amenities for Plaintiff in Persistent Vegetative State(Sep 2000)
Low & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	Ng Chee Wee v Tan Chin Seng: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries(Feb 2013) Kwek Peck Ying v Loh Kwang Chay: Negligence & Traffic Accident at Woodlands Road & Kranji Expressway(Apr 2007)
Undisclosed	1 cases	14% of cases	Mah Chee Kok v Cheng Chee Kim: Personal Injury Claim for Construction Foreman(Nov 2003)
Chor Pee & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance: Contractors' All Risks Policy Dispute(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Tiang Hock's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.2 parties avg	2.2	86%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Tiang Hock's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(86%)	86%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	677,853.68	225,951.233 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Wee v Tan Chin Seng: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries 27 Feb 2013 Tan Chin Seng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Feb 2013	Tan Chin Seng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kwek Peck Ying v Loh Kwang Chay: Negligence & Traffic Accident at Woodlands Road & Kranji Expressway 22 Apr 2007 Loh Kwang Chay (Defendant)Lost	22 Apr 2007	Loh Kwang Chay (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant found wholly liable for the accident; claim against third party dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mah Chee Kok v Cheng Chee Kim: Personal Injury Claim for Construction Foreman 12 Nov 2003 Cheng Chee Kim (Defendant)Lost	12 Nov 2003	Cheng Chee Kim (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for $124,292.70 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim 18 Apr 2001 Hong Choon Peng (Respondent)Lost	18 Apr 2001	Hong Choon Peng (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; original award of $80,000 restored.
5	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd: Settlement Agreement & Insurance Claim Dispute 18 Apr 2001 The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Apr 2001	The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment against the respondent in the sum of $553,560.98 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Loss of Amenities for Plaintiff in Persistent Vegetative State 28 Sep 2000 Hong Choon Peng (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2000	Hong Choon Peng (Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, reducing the damages to be paid by the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance: Contractors' All Risks Policy Dispute 20 Jul 2000 The Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited (Defendant)Won	20 Jul 2000	The Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs.