Low Wei Ling Wendy

Low Wei Ling Wendy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and sale and purchase of shares. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase of Shares	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Wei Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Wei Ling Wendy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Golden Village v Golden Harvest: Validity of Director Resolution & Companies Act Interpretation(Jun 2006)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence(Dec 2010)
Hee Theng Fong & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Breach of Contract in Share Sale Dispute(Apr 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Wei Ling Wendy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Wei Ling Wendy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	414,200.00	138,066.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 27 Dec 2010 Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Dec 2010	Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Breach of Contract in Share Sale Dispute 06 Apr 2008 Su Sh-Hsyu (Defendant)Lost	06 Apr 2008	Su Sh-Hsyu (Defendant): Failed in her defenceDefendant failed to prove payment for the shares and is ordered to pay the plaintiff S$414,200 plus interest and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Golden Village v Golden Harvest: Validity of Director Resolution & Companies Act Interpretation 27 Jun 2006 Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	27 Jun 2006	Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the assistant registrar was reversed, and the first defendant's application to strike out the action was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.