Lynn Tan

Lynn Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and prevention of corruption act. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lynn Tan has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lynn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lynn Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Kandasamy Senapathi v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & CDSA Offences(Oct 2023) PP v Ng Sae Kiat: Securities Fraud & CFD Manipulation Appeal(Jul 2015) Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lynn Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lynn Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kandasamy Senapathi v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & CDSA Offences 16 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against sentence was dismissed.
2	PP v Ng Sae Kiat: Securities Fraud & CFD Manipulation Appeal 29 Jul 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	29 Jul 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution’s appeals against the sentences imposed on the Respondents were dismissed.
3	Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence 05 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	05 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal on the second charge was successful. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor: Corruption involving Agent and Reward for Appointment 23 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	23 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal on the second charge allowedThe High Court allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal on the second charge.
5	Ahunbay v PP: Interpreting Section 370 CPC on Seized Property & Right to Be Heard 10 Feb 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	10 Feb 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Questions of law answeredThe court answered the questions of law referred against the Public Prosecutor.