M Amaladass

M Amaladass is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal procedure. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Amaladass has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of Statements	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Amaladass has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M Amaladass has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Dass & Co	3 cases	100% of cases	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure(Oct 2001) Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Breach of Trust & Mortgage Dispute(Sep 2001) Yusof bin A Samad v PP: Corruption by Police Hearse Driver & Admissibility of Statements(Sep 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Amaladass's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	26.5 parties avg	6.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Amaladass's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure 11 Oct 2001 Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent)Lost	11 Oct 2001	Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent): Appeal deniedAppeal denied.
2	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Breach of Trust & Mortgage Dispute 25 Sep 2001 Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent)Lost	25 Sep 2001	Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed against Ms Lim. Ms Lim was found to have committed a breach of trust and is accountable to Mdm Ho for the loss she has sustained. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Yusof bin A Samad v PP: Corruption by Police Hearse Driver & Admissibility of Statements 03 Sep 2000 Yusof bin A Samad (Appellant)Lost	03 Sep 2000	Yusof bin A Samad (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.