M K Eusuff Ali

M K Eusuff Ali is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and constructive dismissal. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied term of mutual trust and confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M K Eusuff Ali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M K Eusuff Ali has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	7 cases	100% of cases	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business(Mar 2024) Moveon Technologies v Crystal-Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings under Arbitration Act(Jan 2024) Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct and Forgery(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M K Eusuff Ali's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M K Eusuff Ali's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Won	5(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,024,732.85	1,004,946.575 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business 26 Mar 2024 Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	26 Mar 2024	Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Non-party): Application dismissedMoveon Technologies Pte Ltd appeared as a non-party and opposed the Application. The application was ultimately granted.
2	Moveon Technologies v Crystal-Moveon Technologies: Stay of Proceedings under Arbitration Act 15 Jan 2024 Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	15 Jan 2024	Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissed.Defendant's application to stay proceedings was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
3	Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct and Forgery 13 Aug 2019 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	13 Aug 2019	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order for Respondent to be struck offThe court ordered that the respondent be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and awarded costs of the proceedings to the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	UTOC Engineering v ASK Singapore: Assessment of Damages for Defective Refractory Works 18 Oct 2017 UTOC Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	18 Oct 2017	UTOC Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages assessed at $5,024,732.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages 06 Aug 2014 Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Aug 2014	Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant's claim for damages beyond the contractual notice period was legally unsustainable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages 25 Dec 2013 Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 Dec 2013	Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was granted.
7	Tan Hup Thye v Refco: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Bonus Entitlements Dispute 10 May 2010 Tan Hup Thye (Plaintiff)Lost	10 May 2010	Tan Hup Thye (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for bonus entitlements was dismissed.