M Kayal Pillay

M Kayal Pillay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Kayal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M Kayal Pillay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault(Jun 2024) Public Prosecutor v Fatahurhman bin Bakar: Road Rage Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Kayal Pillay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Kayal Pillay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault 25 Jun 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	25 Jun 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Reformative training imposedThe court imposed a sentence of reformative training at Level 2 intensity for a minimum period of detention of 12 months.
2	Public Prosecutor v Fatahurhman bin Bakar: Road Rage Sentencing Appeal 26 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	26 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partProsecution's appeal against the sentence for the charge under Section 323 of the Penal Code was allowed.