M. Lukshumayeh

M. Lukshumayeh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and drug crimes.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and drug crimes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M. Lukshumayeh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M. Lukshumayeh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Central Chambers Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal(Mar 2013)
Lukshumayeh Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Progress ABMS v Progress Welded Mesh: Summary Judgment & Counterclaim in Construction Materials Sale(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M. Lukshumayeh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M. Lukshumayeh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	429,755.72	429,755.721 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Progress ABMS v Progress Welded Mesh: Summary Judgment & Counterclaim in Construction Materials Sale 28 Jan 2024 Progress ABMS Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	28 Jan 2024	Progress ABMS Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmed for $429,755.72 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mervin Singh v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Presumption of Knowledge, and Rebuttal 07 Mar 2013 Second Appellant (Appellant)Lost	07 Mar 2013	Second Appellant (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the Second Appellant's appeal, concluding the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the second appellant was in possession of the pink box for the purposes of trafficking, and that he had knowledge that the pink box contained diamorphine.