M Nedumaran

M Nedumaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and work injury compensation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Nedumaran has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Nedumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M Nedumaran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Nedumaran & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2015)
M/s M Nedumaran & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Nedumaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Nedumaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability 22 May 2017 T & Zee Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	22 May 2017	T & Zee Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): NeutralNo order for costs of the hearing below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2015 V Shanmugam a/l Veloo (Defendant)Partial	02 Feb 2015	V Shanmugam a/l Veloo (Defendant): PartialConvicted of drug trafficking but spared the death penalty due to substantive assistance to CNB; sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.