M P Kanisan

M P Kanisan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal malpractice and illegality and public policy. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M P Kanisan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and agency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Charges	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M P Kanisan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M P Kanisan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M P Kanisan & Partners	3 cases	75% of cases	Ting Siew May v Boon Lay Choo: Enforceability of Backdated Option to Purchase & Illegality(May 2014) Panasonic v Stratech: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in ERP System Implementation(Oct 2008) MISC Bhd v Griffin Kinetic: Lien & Contract Dispute over Turbine Storage Charges(Sep 2008)
Palakrishnan & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Subramaniam v Ng: Negligence Claim Against Solicitor in Property Sale(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M P Kanisan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M P Kanisan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ting Siew May v Boon Lay Choo: Enforceability of Backdated Option to Purchase & Illegality 25 May 2014 Ting Siew May (Appellant)Won	25 May 2014	Ting Siew May (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs and consequential orders.
2	Panasonic v Stratech: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in ERP System Implementation 09 Oct 2008 Stratech Systems Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Oct 2008	Stratech Systems Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	MISC Bhd v Griffin Kinetic: Lien & Contract Dispute over Turbine Storage Charges 15 Sep 2008 Griffin Kinetic Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2008	Griffin Kinetic Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedSecond defendant’s claim against the plaintiff is also dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Subramaniam v Ng: Negligence Claim Against Solicitor in Property Sale 30 Oct 2000 Kandasamy Ambualagan (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Oct 2000	Kandasamy Ambualagan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant for negligence was dismissed.