M Rajaram

M Rajaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Rajaram has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M Rajaram has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Central Bank of India v Hemant Bansal: Dismissal for Want of Prosecution & Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence(Jan 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Rajaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Rajaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	2,381,786.56	2,381,786.561 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Central Bank of India v Hemant Bansal: Dismissal for Want of Prosecution & Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence 06 Jan 2002 Aneeta Bansal (Defendant)Lost	06 Jan 2002	Aneeta Bansal (Defendant): Claim AllowedJudgment against the second defendant in the sum of US$1,190,893.28 in Suit 1045/99.