M Ravi

M Ravi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 38 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and sentencing. Their track record shows a 11.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Ravi has demonstrated expertise across 74 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	26 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	22 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	21 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 21 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	18 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Human Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Coroners Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inquiries	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fair Criticism	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Clemency Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trafficking of Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corroboration Warning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inconsistencies in Testimony	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Refinancing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Tranquillity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Re-trial	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Miscarriage of Justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Election, Campaign and Political Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	M Ravi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

M Ravi has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
L F Violet Netto	20 cases	53% of cases	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2015) Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng: Defamation, Freedom of Speech, and Criminal Misappropriation Allegations(Nov 2014) Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection(Oct 2014)
M Ravi & Co	8 cases	21% of cases	Ng Chye Huey v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Criminal Motion & Abuse of Process(Jan 2007) Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Defamation & Summary Judgment(Nov 2006) Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Rules of Court Amendment & Right to Fair Hearing(Sep 2006)
LF Violet Netto	5 cases	13% of cases	Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC(Oct 2012) Vellama v AG: Prime Minister's Discretion on By-Elections in Hougang SMC(Jul 2012) Vellama v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Order for By-Election in Hougang SMC(Apr 2012)
M Ravi and Co	4 cases	11% of cases	Lim Cher Foong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Carnal Intercourse(Feb 2005) Selvarajoo v PP: Criminal Revision for Cheating Conviction Based on Fresh Evidence(Feb 2004) Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor: Rioting Conviction and Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2004)
Joseph Chen & Co	1 cases	3% of cases	Ishwaribai Ramchand Daswani v Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani: Setting Aside Consent Orders for Account of Assets(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Ravi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 3 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Lost	312.5 parties avg	2.5	82%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Won	42.4 parties avg	2.4	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	53.8 parties avg	3.8
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	72.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Ravi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	31(82%)	82%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	1(3%)	3%
Won	4(11%)	11%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	27,000.00	2,250.0012 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2011	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 3 cases (75.0%)
2012	7 511	Lost: 5 cases (71.4%) Neutral: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 38 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Mar 2015 Yong Vui Kong (Appellant)Lost	03 Mar 2015	Yong Vui Kong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppellant's appeal against sentence was dismissed.
2	Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng: Defamation, Freedom of Speech, and Criminal Misappropriation Allegations 06 Nov 2014 ROY NGERNG YI LING (Defendant)Lost	06 Nov 2014	ROY NGERNG YI LING (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment granted to the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection 27 Oct 2014 Tan Eng Hong (Appellant)Lost	27 Oct 2014	Tan Eng Hong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General: Application for Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance 26 Jun 2014 Cheong Chun Yin (Applicant)Lost	26 Jun 2014	Cheong Chun Yin (Applicant): Application DismissedApplicant's application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.
5	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel Upon Arrest & Access to Counsel 13 Jan 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	13 Jan 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's motion for a declaration of an immediate right to counsel and an order for immediate access to counsel was dismissed.
6	Selvi v Attorney-General: Coroner's Inquiry & Death in Custody 31 Oct 2013 Selvi d/o Narayanasamy (Applicant)Lost	31 Oct 2013	Selvi d/o Narayanasamy (Applicant): Application for leave dismissedApplication for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & LGBTQ Rights 01 Oct 2013 Tan Eng Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Oct 2013	Tan Eng Hong (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application to challenge the constitutionality of s 377A was dismissed.
8	Attorney-General v Vellama: Costs in Withdrawing Appeal for Judicial Review of Prime Minister's By-Election Discretion 01 Nov 2012 Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Respondent)Neutral	01 Nov 2012	Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Respondent): No Costs AwardedThe court made no order of costs in the proceedings.
9	Vellama v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of By-Election Timing in Hougang SMC 31 Oct 2012 Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant)Lost	31 Oct 2012	Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; no order as to costs.
10	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: MAS Loan to IMF & Constitutionality 21 Oct 2012 Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew (Applicant)Lost	21 Oct 2012	Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to apply for prerogative orders and declarations was dismissed with costs.
11	Vellama v AG: Prime Minister's Discretion on By-Elections in Hougang SMC 31 Jul 2012 Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant)Lost	31 Jul 2012	Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application for declarations and a mandatory order was dismissed.
12	Vellama v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Order for By-Election in Hougang SMC 08 Apr 2012 Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant)Partial	08 Apr 2012	Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Applicant): Leave grantedLeave granted for a substantive judicial review hearing.
13	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Selective Prosecution & Constitutional Right to Equal Protection 03 Apr 2012 Yong Vui Kong (Applicant)Lost	03 Apr 2012	Yong Vui Kong (Applicant): Motion dismissedThe court dismissed Yong Vui Kong's motion, finding no merit in his arguments.
14	Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Drug Trafficking Conviction 09 Jan 2012 Ramalingam Ravinthran (Applicant)Lost	09 Jan 2012	Ramalingam Ravinthran (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe applicant's motion to re-open the judgment was dismissed.
15	AQV v AQW: Wife's Application to Set Aside Ancillary Orders Based on Alleged Judicial Bias 31 May 2011 AQV (Plaintiff)Dismissed	31 May 2011	AQV (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs.
16	Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Alleged Discriminatory Prosecution 30 May 2011 Ramalingam Ravinthran (Plaintiff)Lost	30 May 2011	Ramalingam Ravinthran (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for a prohibition order against the Director of Prisons and a mandatory order against the Attorney-General was dismissed. No order was made with respect to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Clemency Power 03 Apr 2011 Yong Vui Kong (Appellant)Lost	03 Apr 2011	Yong Vui Kong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
18	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A of Penal Code 14 Mar 2011 Tan Eng Hong (Appellant)Lost	14 Mar 2011	Tan Eng Hong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Attorney-General. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary 15 Nov 2010 Shadrake Alan (Respondent)Lost	15 Nov 2010	Shadrake Alan (Respondent): Contempt of court convictionSentenced to 6 weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of S$20,000, in default of which he shall serve a further 2 weeks in prison (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan: Contempt of Court, Scandalizing the Judiciary 02 Nov 2010 Shadrake Alan (Respondent)Lost	02 Nov 2010	Shadrake Alan (Respondent): Convicted of ContemptMr. Shadrake found guilty of the offence of contempt by scandalising the court and convicted accordingly.
21	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Clemency Process 12 Aug 2010 Yong Vui Kong (Applicant)Lost	12 Aug 2010	Yong Vui Kong (Applicant): Application dismissedThe court dismissed Yong Vui Kong's application for leave to seek judicial review of the clemency process.
22	AKD v Public Prosecutor: Outraging Modesty of Domestic Worker - Appeal Against Conviction Allowed 12 Aug 2010 AKD (Appellant)Won	12 Aug 2010	AKD (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal against conviction allowed; the appellant was acquitted.
23	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Mandatory Death Penalty under Singapore Law 13 May 2010 Yong Vui Kong (Appellant)Lost	13 May 2010	Yong Vui Kong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentence of death was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Yong Vui Kong v PP: Extension of Time to Appeal Mandatory Death Sentence 30 Dec 2009 Yong Vui Kong (Applicant)Won	30 Dec 2009	Yong Vui Kong (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe applicant was allowed to proceed with his appeal.
25	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal on Drug Trafficking Charges 02 Dec 2009 Yong Vui Kong (Applicant)Won	02 Dec 2009	Yong Vui Kong (Applicant): Stay of execution grantedStay of execution granted pending a decision by the Court of Appeal.
26	Ishwaribai Ramchand Daswani v Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani: Setting Aside Consent Orders for Account of Assets 22 Mar 2009 Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani (Defendant)Lost	22 Mar 2009	Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani (Defendant): Summons dismissedThe defendant's summons to set aside the orders was dismissed.
27	Ng Chye Huey v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Criminal Motion & Abuse of Process 23 Jan 2007 Erh Boon Tiong (Applicant)Lost	23 Jan 2007	Erh Boon Tiong (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication dismissed as misconceived.
28	Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Defamation & Summary Judgment 30 Nov 2006 Chee Soon Juan (Defendant)Lost	30 Nov 2006	Chee Soon Juan (Defendant): Interlocutory judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Rules of Court Amendment & Right to Fair Hearing 12 Sep 2006 Chee Soon Juan (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Sep 2006	Chee Soon Juan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to be taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General: Application for Judge Recusal Due to Potential Bias 02 Aug 2006 Chee Soon Juan (Applicant)Won	02 Aug 2006	Chee Soon Juan (Applicant): Application grantedApplication for judge to recuse himself was granted.
31	Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General: Election Petition Dismissal for Failure to Provide Security for Costs 21 Jun 2006 Chee Siok Chin (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2006	Chee Siok Chin (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to declare the results of the General Elections 2006 null and void was dismissed due to failure to provide security for costs. Costs of the application are to be taxed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Attorney-General v Chee Soon Juan: Contempt of Court for Scandalizing Judiciary 30 Mar 2006 Chee Soon Juan (Respondent)Lost	30 Mar 2006	Chee Soon Juan (Respondent): Order of committal grantedFound guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to one day in jail and a fine of $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), with seven days' imprisonment in default of payment.
33	Lim Cher Foong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Carnal Intercourse 01 Feb 2005 Lim Cher Foong (Appellant)Lost	01 Feb 2005	Lim Cher Foong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
34	Selvarajoo v PP: Criminal Revision for Cheating Conviction Based on Fresh Evidence 24 Feb 2004 Selvarajoo s/o Malayappan Krishsamy (Petitioner)Lost	24 Feb 2004	Selvarajoo s/o Malayappan Krishsamy (Petitioner): Petition dismissedThe petition for criminal revision was dismissed.
35	Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor: Rioting Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 23 Feb 2004 Phua Song Hua (Appellant)Lost	23 Feb 2004	Phua Song Hua (Appellant): Appeal DismissedPhua Song Hua's appeal against his conviction and sentence for rioting was dismissed.
36	Vignes s/o Mourthi v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Re-Trial Application After Appeal Dismissal 12 Oct 2003 Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant)Lost	12 Oct 2003	Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount is applicable.
37	Vignes s/o Mourthi v Public Prosecutor: Application for Retrial and Stay of Execution in Death Sentence Case 17 Sep 2003 Vignes s/o Mourthi (Applicant)Lost	17 Sep 2003	Vignes s/o Mourthi (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for retrial and stay of execution was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.
38	Tan Puay Boon v Public Prosecutor: Falsification of Accounts under Penal Code s 477A 17 Aug 2003 Tan Puay Boon (Appellant)Lost	17 Aug 2003	Tan Puay Boon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against her conviction and sentence was dismissed.