Mabel Tan

Mabel Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mabel Tan has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and insolvency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Issuance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mabel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mabel Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings: Breach of Contract & Conspiracy Claim in Coal Sale Dispute(Mar 2015) Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings: Breach of Contract, Coal Quality Dispute(Feb 2015)
Virtus Law LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Re Swiber Holdings Ltd: Trustee's Voting Rights & Expenses in Judicial Management(Sep 2018) Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mabel Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 4 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Neutral	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mabel Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	4 121	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2018	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Swiber Holdings Ltd: Trustee's Voting Rights & Expenses in Judicial Management 30 Sep 2018 ICBC (Other)Neutral	30 Sep 2018	ICBC (Other): No specific outcomeICBC was a party in the case.
2	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 ICBC (Other)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	ICBC (Other): NeutralICBC was represented by counsel.
3	Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings: Breach of Contract & Conspiracy Claim in Coal Sale Dispute 26 Mar 2015 Vinay Parmanad Hariani (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2015	Vinay Parmanad Hariani (Respondent): WonCosts awarded in defending against Gimpex’s conspiracy and piercing of the corporate veil claims. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings: Breach of Contract, Coal Quality Dispute 08 Feb 2015 Vinay Parmanad Hariani (Respondent)Dismissed	08 Feb 2015	Vinay Parmanad Hariani (Respondent): Claims dismissedClaims against Vinay Parmanad Hariani were dismissed.