Mabelle Tay

Mabelle Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in service out of jurisdiction and international arbitration act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mabelle Tay has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in jurisdiction and litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Jurisdiction	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mabelle Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mabelle Tay has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ascendant Legal LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(May 2018)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	PT Makindo v Aperchance: Contempt of Court for Misleading Advertisements(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mabelle Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mabelle Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 21 May 2018 PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama (Defendant, Respondent)Won	21 May 2018	PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama (Defendant, Respondent): Conversion Claim stayed in favour of arbitrationThe Conversion Claim against TPPI was stayed in favour of arbitration pursuant to s 6 of the International Arbitration Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	PT Makindo v Aperchance: Contempt of Court for Misleading Advertisements 04 Aug 2010 PT Makindo (formerly known as PT Makindo TBK) (Applicant)Lost	04 Aug 2010	PT Makindo (formerly known as PT Makindo TBK) (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for an order that the 1st respondent be fined for contempt of court was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.