Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai

Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and judgments and orders. Their track record shows a 52.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated expertise across 86 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	10 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time-Fixing Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provisional Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marital Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Provisional Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	23 cases	100% of cases	DFM v DFL: Jurisdictional Waiver in Interim Arbitration Relief Application(Oct 2024) Navayo International AG v Ministry of Defence: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Costs(Oct 2024) Hilton v Sun Travels: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Arbitration Award(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 9 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.3 parties avg	3.3	30%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	124.2 parties avg	4.2	52%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2020	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	44.2 parties avg	4.2
2023	44.4 parties avg	4.4
2024	52.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(30%)	30%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Partial	3(13%)	13%
Won	12(52%)	52%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	31,697,948.87	1,864,585.2317 cases	17

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2023	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DFM v DFL: Jurisdictional Waiver in Interim Arbitration Relief Application 16 Oct 2024 DFM (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2024	DFM (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed in the aggregate sum of $31,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Navayo International AG v Ministry of Defence: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Costs 03 Oct 2024 MEHIB – Hungarian Export Credit Insurance Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	03 Oct 2024	MEHIB – Hungarian Export Credit Insurance Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts awarded in the amount of $116,943.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hilton v Sun Travels: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Arbitration Award 08 May 2024 Ahmed Siyam Mohamed (Defendant)Lost	08 May 2024	Ahmed Siyam Mohamed (Defendant): Contempt of CourtFound in contempt of court; initially sentenced to imprisonment, later substituted with a $100,000 fine upon full payment of the judgment debt (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Navayo International AG v Ministry of Defence: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Public Policy 21 Apr 2024 MEHIB – Hungarian Export Credit Insurance Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2024	MEHIB – Hungarian Export Credit Insurance Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for extension of time to file SUM 589 refusedApplication for extension of time to file SUM 589 refused; assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	DFL v DFM: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Provisional Award Under DIAC Rules 14 Mar 2024 DFM (Respondent)Lost	14 Mar 2024	DFM (Respondent): Order to pay costsThe respondent was ordered to pay the applicant costs, fixed at $50,500 (inclusive of disbursements amounting to $32,500). The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts 29 Nov 2023 Douglas Gan Yi Dong (Claimant)Lost	29 Nov 2023	Douglas Gan Yi Dong (Claimant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
7	ONGC Petro additions Ltd v DL E&C Co: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Breach of Natural Justice 23 Jul 2023 DL E&C Co, Ltd (formerly known as Daelim Industrial Co Ltd) (Defendant)Won	23 Jul 2023	DL E&C Co, Ltd (formerly known as Daelim Industrial Co Ltd) (Defendant): Application DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the claimant's application to set aside the arbitration award.
8	Public Prosecutor v Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan: Trafficking of Diamorphine 29 Jun 2023 Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2023	Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was found guilty as charged and convicted accordingly and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
9	General Hotel Management v The Wave Studio: Copyright Ownership & Offer to Settle 03 Apr 2023 The Wave Studio, LLC (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2023	The Wave Studio, LLC (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appellants were ordered to pay the respondents net costs of $45,000, inclusive of disbursements for both appeals (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Enjin Pte Ltd v Pritchard Lilia: Marital Privilege, Oral Agreements & Cryptocurrency 21 Aug 2022 Enjin Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Aug 2022	Enjin Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedMs Pritchard is to pay Enjin the total sum of S$213,555.64 together with simple interest at the court rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ originally filed in the District Court until date of judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Wei Ho-Hung v Lyu Jun: Appeal on Gifts, Resulting Trusts, and Quistclose Trusts in Unmarried Couple's Dispute 18 Aug 2022 Wei Ho-Hung (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	18 Aug 2022	Wei Ho-Hung (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed except for the second clinic investment claim. The court reduced the order for repayment by S$40,000.
12	Viking Engineering v Feen: Minority Oppression & Breach of Contract in Joint Venture 28 Jun 2022 Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2022	Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs of the application be paid by the Defendants to Viking Engineering, fixed at S$24,005.53 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	The Wave Studio v. General Hotel Management: Copyright Infringement & Hotel Photography 15 Jun 2022 The Wave Studio, LLC (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jun 2022	The Wave Studio, LLC (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Toh Eng Tiah v Angelina Jiang: Gifts, Inter Vivos, Contract Law, and Sham Agreements 04 Mar 2021 Angelina Jiang (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	04 Mar 2021	Angelina Jiang (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Partial WinEntitled to payment of $45,000 from Toh Eng Tiah after setting off sums owed. The court found the Loan Facilities Agreement to be a sham.
15	Feen v Viking Engineering: Minority Oppression, Share Valuation & Companies Act 16 Nov 2020 Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	16 Nov 2020	Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $45,000 awarded to Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Goh Seng Heng v Wang Xiaopu: Appeal on Repayment of Sales Proceeds & Security for Costs 08 Jul 2020 Wang Xiaopu (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	08 Jul 2020	Wang Xiaopu (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal papers deemed filed and servedThe time required for the filing of the appellant’s appeal papers as stipulated in the Rules of Court is extended to today and the said appeal papers filed on 23 March 2020 are deemed filed and served today.
17	Viking Engineering v. Feen: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 26 Apr 2020 Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	26 Apr 2020	Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Originating Summons dismissedOriginating Summons filed by the defendants was dismissed. The purchase price of the shares was set in accordance with the valuation determined in the Report. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Share Purchase Agreements 04 Dec 2019 Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	04 Dec 2019	Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffGoh is to repay the sales proceeds of S$30,700,000 from the sale of 66,000 shares in AMP to Wang in exchange for the re-transfer of those shares, with interest at a rate of 5.33% per annum from the dates on which the payments were made. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Viking Engineering Pte Ltd v Bjornar Feen: Minority Oppression & Valuation Dispute 03 Jul 2019 Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	03 Jul 2019	Viking Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Order for payment of valuation costs in favour of plaintiffCosts, inclusive of disbursements, were ordered in favour of Viking Engineering in the sum of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Sumber Indah v Kamala Jewellers: Extension of Time for Consent Order Compliance 21 Mar 2018 SUMBER INDAH PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	21 Mar 2018	SUMBER INDAH PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Summons 281/2018 AllowedPlaintiff's application in Summons 281/2018 allowed; Defendant to pay costs fixed at $2,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Kao Chai-Chau Linda: Trust Shares Dispute 22 May 2017 Linda Kao Chai-Chau (Defendant)Lost	22 May 2017	Linda Kao Chai-Chau (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court declared that the trust shares registered in Ms. Kao’s name are held on trust for the estate of Peter Fong and Ms. Kao is obliged to comply with the directions of HSBC (as executor of the estate of Peter Fong) as to the exercise of the voting rights attached to the trust shares and the disposal of the trust shares. Ms. Kao is to pay Ms. Fong’s costs of this application, fixed at $15,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Appellant)Lost	25 Jan 2016	Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
23	Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn: Dispute over Receivers and Managers' Fees in Airtrust (Singapore) Insolvency 13 Oct 2015 Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Oct 2015	Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Plaintiff): Fees reducedFees reduced by the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.