Manimaran Arumugam

Manimaran Arumugam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in chancery and equity and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manimaran Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manimaran Arumugam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mani & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Poondy Radhakrishnan v Sivapiragasam: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duties(Oct 2009) Chia Kin Tuck v Chia Ee Moey: Caveat Withdrawal & Property Sale Dispute(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manimaran Arumugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manimaran Arumugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,000.00	13,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Poondy Radhakrishnan v Sivapiragasam: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duties 08 Oct 2009 Visvalingam Naidu s/o Munisamy (Plaintiff)Won	08 Oct 2009	Visvalingam Naidu s/o Munisamy (Plaintiff): Application AllowedApplication to pursue a derivative action in the name of Megatech System against Sivapiragasam was granted. Costs of the application were fixed at $6,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chia Kin Tuck v Chia Ee Moey: Caveat Withdrawal & Property Sale Dispute 20 May 2008 Leong Choon Kum (Defendant)Lost	20 May 2008	Leong Choon Kum (Defendant): Caveat withdrawal orderedThe fourth defendant was ordered to withdraw her caveat against the property.