Manoj Belani

Manoj Belani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and gifts law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manoj Belani has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Belani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manoj Belani has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation(Jan 2025) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manoj Belani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	24.8 parties avg	4.8	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manoj Belani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	285,705.00	142,852.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation 30 Jan 2025 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	30 Jan 2025	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralDyStar took no position on the Appeals.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Aug 2024	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial success in costs applicationKiri to pay DyStar costs in the sum of S$125,705.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	19 May 2024	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Shares to be sold en blocThe court ordered an en bloc sale of the shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
4	Soemarto Sulistio v Stukan Yetty Fang: Inter Vivos Gift of Gold Bars & Constructive Trusts Dispute 22 Jul 2021 Sulistio Edy (Respondent, Defendant)Won	22 Jul 2021	Sulistio Edy (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs of S$40,000 from the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	IPP Financial Advisers v Saimee: Negligent Misrepresentation, Limitation & Vicarious Liability 12 May 2020 IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	12 May 2020	IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedSaimee’s claims against the appellants are time-barred and must therefore fail.