Manoj Nandwani Prakash

Manoj Nandwani Prakash is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manoj Nandwani Prakash has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs(Jul 2018) PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manoj Nandwani Prakash's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manoj Nandwani Prakash's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs 25 Jul 2018 GABRIEL LAW COPORATION (Defendant)Partial	25 Jul 2018	GABRIEL LAW COPORATION (Defendant): Partial LossOrdered to pay the costs of the application to the Plaintiff. Leave granted to have Invoice 39 and Invoice 86 taxed.
2	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Chum Tat Suan (Respondent)Lost	27 Nov 2014	Chum Tat Suan (Respondent): Finding quashedThe Judge’s findings that Chum’s involvement in committing the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively fell within the ambit of ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a) ought to be quashed.