Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara

Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and restructuring and dissolution.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Capital	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	6 cases	86% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) Zhu Su v Three Arrows Capital Ltd: Appeal of Insolvency Order under IRDA(May 2024) Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA(Nov 2023)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn: Dispute over Receivers and Managers' Fees in Airtrust (Singapore) Insolvency(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 5 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.3 parties avg	4.3	29%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14%
Won	45.4 parties avg	5.4	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2024	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manoj Pillay Sandrasegara's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	4,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Aug 2024	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Zhu Su v Three Arrows Capital Ltd: Appeal of Insolvency Order under IRDA 09 May 2024 Russell Crumpler (Respondent)Won	09 May 2024	Russell Crumpler (Respondent): Successful defenseRespondents awarded costs of $4,000 inclusive of disbursements against Mr. Zhu and Mr. Davies respectively (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA 09 Nov 2023 Ee Meng Yen Angela (Claimant)Won	09 Nov 2023	Ee Meng Yen Angela (Claimant): Winding up orderedApplication to wind up Hodlnaut Pte Ltd granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Enterprise Fund III Ltd v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Company Acquiring Own Shares & Estoppel 12 Sep 2019 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant)Lost	12 Sep 2019	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
5	Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn: Dispute over Receivers and Managers' Fees in Airtrust (Singapore) Insolvency 13 Oct 2015 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Limited (Defendant)Partial	13 Oct 2015	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Limited (Defendant): Fees reducedFees reduced by the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	MF Global Singapore v Vintage Bullion: Proprietary Claims in Liquidation 24 Jun 2015 Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2015	Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant): LostJudgment in favor of the Liquidators on the substantive issues.
7	Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship 13 Feb 2014 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Feb 2014	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed for the commencement of third party proceedings.