Manoj Sandrasegara

Manoj Sandrasegara is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and presumption of advancement. Their track record shows a 41.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 41% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated expertise across 82 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Part Performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deed of Family Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership and Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Family Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Sandrasegara has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manoj Sandrasegara has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	11 cases	65% of cases	Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Forum Non Conveniens & Tort of Misrepresentation(Mar 2011) Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking(May 2010) Liquidators of Natural Fuel v Power Knight: Priority of Creditors' Interests over Fixed Charge(Mar 2010)
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	24% of cases	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022) Tan Poh Beng v Choo Lee Mei: Enforceability of Foreign Ancillary Orders for Property Division in Singapore(Aug 2014) Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations(May 2013)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions(May 2012)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	Tay Way Bock v Yeunh Oi Siong: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Contract(Feb 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manoj Sandrasegara's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 7 (41%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.7 parties avg	4.7	35%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Partial	35.7 parties avg	5.7	18%
Won	75.0 parties avg	5.0	41%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	311.3 parties avg	11.3
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	33.6 parties avg	3.6
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manoj Sandrasegara's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(35%)	35%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(18%)	18%
Won	7(41%)	41%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,571,991.83	938,855.987 cases	7
USD	0.32	0.321 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Judicial Managers of Xihe Holdings (Respondent)Partial	13 Mar 2022	Judicial Managers of Xihe Holdings (Respondent): PartialThe court held that the judicial management expenses principle generally did not apply to the claims arising out of the vessels that were the subject of SUM 2085, subject to certain exceptions. Costs were awarded against the Judicial Managers of Xihe Holdings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Poh Beng v Choo Lee Mei: Enforceability of Foreign Ancillary Orders for Property Division in Singapore 17 Aug 2014 Tan Poh Beng (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Aug 2014	Tan Poh Beng (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for the sale of the property and enforcement of the Malaysian Court Order was dismissed. No order as to costs was made, given the Defendant's unreasonable refusal to execute the Transfer Instrument. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	16 May 2013	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions 02 May 2012 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff)Won	02 May 2012	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff. Teo is to pay CIC $2,782,803.66 for the shares delivered, $3,625,393.11 for closing out costs, and interest of $51,323.06 as of 29 August 2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades 10 Apr 2011 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Judgment Set AsideThe judgment in favor of Crédit Industriel et Commercial was set aside, and a new trial was ordered.
6	Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Forum Non Conveniens & Tort of Misrepresentation 10 Mar 2011 Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	10 Mar 2011	Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal was dismissed with costs. The court found that Switzerland is a more appropriate forum for the determination of the dispute than Singapore. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking 19 May 2010 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2010	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the specific monetary amount was not specified in the judgment extract. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Liquidators of Natural Fuel v Power Knight: Priority of Creditors' Interests over Fixed Charge 09 Mar 2010 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Respondent)Won	09 Mar 2010	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against Farooq Ahmad Mann was dismissed.
9	Power Knight v Natural Fuel: Caveat Removal & Statutory Trust in Liquidation 09 Mar 2010 Power Knight Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Mar 2010	Power Knight Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedPower Knight's application to remove the Liquidators' Caveat and the Company's Caveat was granted.
10	Relfo Ltd v Bhimji Velji Jadva Varsani: Anti-Suit Injunction & Foreign Revenue Law 30 Jul 2009 Relfo Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Jul 2009	Relfo Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application Allowed in PartThe plaintiff's application in Summons No 663 of 2009 to adduce documents obtained for Suit No 612 of 2006 in foreign proceedings was allowed.
11	Relfo Ltd v Varsani: Knowing Receipt, Constructive Trust & Foreign Revenue Law 29 Jun 2008 Relfo Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jun 2008	Relfo Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs because it was an attempt to indirectly enforce the revenue laws of the United Kingdom. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Low Gim Siah v Low Geok Khim: Presumption of Advancement in Joint Bank Accounts 21 Dec 2006 Low Geok Bian (Respondent)Lost	21 Dec 2006	Low Geok Bian (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal allowed; the money in the six joint accounts is held by LGB on a resulting trust for the Estate.
13	Low Geok Khim v Low Geok Bian: Presumption of Advancement in Joint Bank Accounts Dispute 09 Mar 2006 Low Geok Bian (Defendant)Won	09 Mar 2006	Low Geok Bian (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found that the moneys in the joint accounts vested in the first defendant as the surviving account holder.
14	Tay Way Bock v Yeunh Oi Siong: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Contract 01 Feb 2006 Yeunh Oi Siong (Defendant, Applicant)Won	01 Feb 2006	Yeunh Oi Siong (Defendant, Applicant): Application to stay proceedings grantedThe defendant's application to stay proceedings was granted, and the case will be heard in Malaysia.
15	Hup Huat Food Industries v Liang Chiang Heng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Trademark Infringement 16 Oct 2003 Liang Kim Poh (Defendant)Won	16 Oct 2003	Liang Kim Poh (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims against this defendant were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Panwell Pte Ltd v Indian Bank: Damages Assessment for Conversion of CBN Notes 18 Sep 2002 Panwell Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Sep 2002	Panwell Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Damages assessed at date of conversionDamages assessed at 32% of the face value of the CBN notes as at the date of conversion. Assumed USD, as the CBN notes are denominated in US dollars.
17	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up 20 Aug 2002 Pinkroccade Educational Services Pte Ltd (formerly known as PDA Pink Elephant Pte Ltd)(in creditors' voluntary winding up) (Respondent)Neutral	20 Aug 2002	Pinkroccade Educational Services Pte Ltd (formerly known as PDA Pink Elephant Pte Ltd)(in creditors' voluntary winding up) (Respondent): Sanction given to make payment to claimantSanction was given to the liquidators to make payment of AUD112,472.00 to the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.