Marc Malone

Marc Malone is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and company law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Marc Malone has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marc Malone has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Marc Malone has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022) Wong Sung Boon v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, and Fiduciary Duties in Employment Law(Feb 2021) Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Singapore Arbitration Award on Wrongful Termination(May 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Marc Malone's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	113.0 parties avg	13.0	33%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Marc Malone's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,880,385.78	1,440,192.892 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Singapore Branch (Other)Neutral	13 Mar 2022	Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Singapore Branch (Other): NeutralCredit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Singapore Branch was on watching brief. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Sung Boon v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, and Fiduciary Duties in Employment Law 01 Feb 2021 Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Feb 2021	Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd for conspiracy and inducement of breach of contract dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Singapore Arbitration Award on Wrongful Termination 28 May 2020 GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	28 May 2020	GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Defendant, Plaintiff): Applications dismissedBloomberry's application to set aside the Final Award and resist enforcement of the Final Award were dismissed.