Marcus Foong

Marcus Foong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal revision. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Marcus Foong has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Foong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Marcus Foong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	3 cases	100% of cases	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2014) Beijing Sinozonto v Goldenray: Enforcement of CIETAC Arbitral Award & Public Policy(Nov 2013) Li Weiming v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Prosecution's Discovery Obligations(Mar 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Marcus Foong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Marcus Foong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	10,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Thomas Philip Doehrman (Respondent)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Thomas Philip Doehrman (Respondent): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.
2	Beijing Sinozonto v Goldenray: Enforcement of CIETAC Arbitral Award & Public Policy 13 Nov 2013 Beijing Sinozonto Mining Investment Co Ltd (Applicant)Won	13 Nov 2013	Beijing Sinozonto Mining Investment Co Ltd (Applicant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Li Weiming v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Prosecution's Discovery Obligations 26 Mar 2013 Thomas Philip Doehrman (Applicant)Partial	26 Mar 2013	Thomas Philip Doehrman (Applicant): Application for particulars granted in partApplication for particulars granted in part; further particulars ordered regarding the identity of the defrauded party and the fictitious sub-contract.