Margaret George

Margaret George is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and conveyance. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Margaret George has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Airline Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interline Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passenger Sales Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rental Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admission of Queen's Counsel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Margaret George has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Koh Ong & Partners	3 cases	50% of cases	McDonald's Rest Restaurants v Wisma Development: Rental Valuation Dispute(Dec 2001) Imrex Aviation v Ellipse Technologies: Appeal on Costs After Discontinuance of Action(Jun 2000) Beloff v Japura: Admission of Queen's Counsel in Land Trespass Dispute(May 2000)
Belinda Ang Tang & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Uzbekistan Airways v Jetspeed Travel: Indemnity for Fictitious Airline Routes(Aug 2008)
Koh Ong and Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Norsiah binte Samat v Neo Poh Guan: Rescission of Property Sale Agreement Due to Road Reserve(Oct 2003)
Koh Ong & Pnrs	1 cases	17% of cases	Japura Development v Singtel: Statutory Interpretation & Telecommunication Plant Installation Rights(May 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Margaret George's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	67%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Margaret George's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	137,166.83	137,166.831 cases	1
SGD	310,000.00	155,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Uzbekistan Airways v Jetspeed Travel: Indemnity for Fictitious Airline Routes 07 Aug 2008 Jetspeed Travel Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Aug 2008	Jetspeed Travel Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against the defendant in the amount of GBP 137,166.83 for the aggregate differences in fare between the lowest official fare applicable to each of the actual journeys flown that British Airways was entitled to and the pro-rated amount British Airways received, based on the fictitious routes.
2	Norsiah binte Samat v Neo Poh Guan: Rescission of Property Sale Agreement Due to Road Reserve 22 Oct 2003 Neo Poh Guan (Defendant)Lost	22 Oct 2003	Neo Poh Guan (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants ordered to repay the deposit of $310,000 with interest at 4% p.a. from 17 December 2002. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	McDonald's Rest Restaurants v Wisma Development: Rental Valuation Dispute 25 Dec 2001 Wisma Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2001	Wisma Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Application dismissedWisma's application to set aside Knight Frank's valuation was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
4	Imrex Aviation v Ellipse Technologies: Appeal on Costs After Discontinuance of Action 28 Jun 2000 Ellipse Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Neutral	28 Jun 2000	Ellipse Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Leave granted to discontinue actionLeave was granted to discontinue the action and the defendants were awarded costs to be agreed or taxed.
5	Japura Development v Singtel: Statutory Interpretation & Telecommunication Plant Installation Rights 09 May 2000 Japura Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	09 May 2000	Japura Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim for trespass was dismissed with costs.
6	Beloff v Japura: Admission of Queen's Counsel in Land Trespass Dispute 04 May 2000 Japura Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 May 2000	Japura Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DeniedJapura's objection to the application was not upheld.