Margaret Joan Ling

Margaret Joan Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and costs. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs against non-party	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint and several liability for costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Margaret Joan Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party(Dec 2021) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Dec 2021) Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Margaret Joan Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	43.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Margaret Joan Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,111,642.11	2,703,880.703 cases	3
USD	481,600,000.00	481,600,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party 26 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Application deniedKiri's application to make Longsheng jointly and severally liable for Senda's costs was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 awarded to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar 20 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Valuation of shares determinedFinal valuation of Kiri's shares adjudged to be US$481.6m.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression 02 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	02 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be valuedShares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be valued (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Dec 2020	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased by DefendantSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The final amount is to be determined based on the adjustments outlined in the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Minority Oppression Suit 10 May 2011 Yeoh Lay Cheng (5th Defendant)Lost	10 May 2011	Yeoh Lay Cheng (5th Defendant): Application for security for costs dismissedApplication for security for costs dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.