Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei

Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and valuation. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pricing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms(Apr 2023) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute(Mar 2023) Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case(Feb 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	55.3 parties avg	5.3	56%
Neutral	46.0 parties avg	6.0	44%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	25.0 parties avg	5.0	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	45.9 parties avg	5.9
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	33.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(36%)	36%
Neutral	4(29%)	29%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	2(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,137,856.41	379,285.473 cases	3
USD	605,156,961.00	302,578,480.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	8 3311	Lost: 3 cases (37.5%) Neutral: 3 cases (37.5%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms 13 Apr 2023 Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	13 Apr 2023	Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedKiri's appeal (CA 57) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Mar 2023	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal valuation of Kiri’s shares adjudged to be US$603.8m for the buy-out order.
3	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Feb 2023	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Favorable determination of infringing product quantityCourt determined the annual tonnage of related products produced by Longsheng to be 56,750 tonnes, with 53,550 tonnes used for notional license fee calculation.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Jul 2022	Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding DLOM and notional license fee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	DyStar v Kiri: Breach of Contract & Res Judicata in Shareholder Agreement 23 Sep 2021 Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Defendant)Neutral	23 Sep 2021	Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Defendant): Not involved in CounterclaimThe second defendant, Mr. Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri, was not involved in the Counterclaim.
6	Kiri Industries v DyStar Global Holdings: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete 18 Oct 2020 Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant)Partial	18 Oct 2020	Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; damages calculation adjusted in favor of Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri. Kiri to obtain 50% of the costs of its appeal. No change to the assessment of DyStar's costs below. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	DyStar Global Holdings v. Kiri Industries: Assessment of Damages and Costs for Breach of Contract 02 Mar 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific orders made against this defendant in this judgment.
8	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	11 Feb 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
9	DyStar v Kiri: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete in Dye Industry 08 Jan 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	08 Jan 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in the provided text.