Marina Chua

Marina Chua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in defamation. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Marina Chua has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in inducement of breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Marina Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Marina Chua has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release(Feb 2010) Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Contract Claims(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Marina Chua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.2
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	27.2 parties avg	7.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	27.2 parties avg	7.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Marina Chua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	70,000.00	35,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release 08 Feb 2010 Rajathurai Suppiah (Plaintiff)Won	08 Feb 2010	Rajathurai Suppiah (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Contract Claims 10 Jan 2010 Charter Shipping Agencies (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2010	Charter Shipping Agencies (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs' claims against the defendant dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.