Mark Goh

Mark Goh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in franchise agreements and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Goh has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Franchise Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Intentions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Franchise Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
No-Assignment Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Goh has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mark Goh & Co	3 cases	38% of cases	Total English Learning v Kids Counsel: Trademark & Copyright Infringement Dispute(Sep 2013) Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution(Mar 2013) Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract and Oppression(Jan 2011)
Belinda Ang Tang & Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Soh Eng Beng v Soh Eng Koon: Will Construction & Rectification Regarding Property Bequest(Aug 2010)
Intelleigen Legal LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Robert Bosch GmbH v YSH Pte Ltd: Trademark, Copyright Infringement & Settlement Agreement Dispute(Jun 2011)
Vanilla Law LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Grande Corp v Cubix Group: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraudulent Misrepresentation(Jun 2019)
MG Chambers LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Total English Learning v Kids Counsel: Franchise Agreement Assignment & Restraint of Trade(Nov 2014)
Peter Low Tang and Belinda Ang	1 cases	13% of cases	Chan Emily v Kang Hock Chai Joachim: Breach of Trust Claim over Shares and Funds(Feb 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Goh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	56.3 parties avg	6.3	63%
Partial	23.7 parties avg	3.7	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2014	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2019	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Goh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(63%)	63%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	1(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	586,576.00	146,644.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Grande Corp v Cubix Group: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraudulent Misrepresentation 06 Jun 2019 Goh Bee Heong (Defendant)Lost	06 Jun 2019	Goh Bee Heong (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against Goh Bee Heong in the amount of S$291,288.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Total English Learning v Kids Counsel: Franchise Agreement Assignment & Restraint of Trade 30 Nov 2014 Total English Learning International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Nov 2014	Total English Learning International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiffs' claims were dismissed due to the invalid assignment of the franchise agreements.
3	Total English Learning v Kids Counsel: Trademark & Copyright Infringement Dispute 11 Sep 2013 Total English Learning International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Sep 2013	Total English Learning International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Ordered to amend Statement of ClaimOrdered to amend the Statement of Claim to provide better particulars regarding the copyright and trademark infringement claims.
4	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution 06 Mar 2013 Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Mar 2013	Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff): Claim struck out in Registrar’s Appeal No 165 of 2010, but successful in appeal against that decisionThe plaintiff's claim was initially struck out but later reinstated on appeal.
5	Robert Bosch GmbH v YSH Pte Ltd: Trademark, Copyright Infringement & Settlement Agreement Dispute 07 Jun 2011 YSH PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	07 Jun 2011	YSH PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of the appeal and below in the sum of $4,000 together with reasonable disbursements to the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract and Oppression 19 Jan 2011 Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jan 2011	Ling Mang Khong Stanley (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's Statement of Claim (Amendment No 3) was struck out under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of Court as it discloses no reasonable cause of action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Soh Eng Beng v Soh Eng Koon: Will Construction & Rectification Regarding Property Bequest 25 Aug 2010 Soh Eng Koon (Respondent)Won	25 Aug 2010	Soh Eng Koon (Respondent): Will construed in favor of respondentThe court construed the will in favor of the respondent and ordered rectification of clause 5. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Chan Emily v Kang Hock Chai Joachim: Breach of Trust Claim over Shares and Funds 17 Feb 2005 Kang Hock Chai Joachim (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2005	Kang Hock Chai Joachim (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant lost the case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).