Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien

Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Delay	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pupillage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Validity of arbitral award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Subpoenas	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Rex Lam Paki v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment on Admissions and Inherent Court Powers(Jul 2023) Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Governance(Dec 2022) Law Society v. Lun Yaodong Clarence: Breach of Legal Profession Rules & Trainee Supervision(Oct 2022)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Lao PDR v. Sanum Investments: Subpoenas for Arbitration Document Production(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%
Won	36.7 parties avg	6.7	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2022	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Jerome Seah Wei Hsien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,000.00	31,250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rex Lam Paki v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment on Admissions and Inherent Court Powers 03 Jul 2023 PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2023	PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs fixed at $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Governance 01 Dec 2022 PNG Sustainable Development Program Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	01 Dec 2022	PNG Sustainable Development Program Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of $80,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Law Society v. Lun Yaodong Clarence: Breach of Legal Profession Rules & Trainee Supervision 27 Oct 2022 Clarence Lun Yaodong (Respondent)Lost	27 Oct 2022	Clarence Lun Yaodong (Respondent): SanctionedSuspension of 18 months imposed and ordered to pay costs of $10,000 to the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tan Bee Hong Blossom v Tan Seng Keow Doreen: Winding Up & Family Business Dispute 29 Apr 2020 Tan Seng Hiong Ivy (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Apr 2020	Tan Seng Hiong Ivy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs’ action dismissed; ordered to pay costs to the Defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lao PDR v. Sanum Investments: Subpoenas for Arbitration Document Production 22 Sep 2013 The Lao People's Democratic Republic (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2013	The Lao People's Democratic Republic (Plaintiff): Applications for subpoenas to produce documents allowedThe court allowed the plaintiff's applications for subpoenas to produce documents.