Mark Lee

Mark Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and garnishee proceedings. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Lee has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee Swee Teow & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Order, Beneficial Ownership & Debt Determination(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	15,047,844.44	15,047,844.441 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Order, Beneficial Ownership & Debt Determination 26 May 2015 Westacre Investments Inc (Plaintiff)Won	26 May 2015	Westacre Investments Inc (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffProvisional garnishee order under Summons in Chambers No 2151/2005/B made final. The sum is based on the amount of US$15,047,844.44 stated by the JC in its statement of claim, and will also include the interest that has accrued since then (assumed USD, as the judgment references USD amounts).