Mark Lewis Shan

Mark Lewis Shan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and defamation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lewis Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Lewis Shan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Ong Kian Peng Julian v Tiong Sze Yin Serene: Defamation and Justification in Doctor's Conduct(Oct 2020) Jeyaretnam v Malayaperumal: Constructive Trusts & Equitable Lien on HDB Flat(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Lewis Shan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.7
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Lewis Shan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	659,625.10	329,812.552 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong Kian Peng Julian v Tiong Sze Yin Serene: Defamation and Justification in Doctor's Conduct 01 Oct 2020 Ong Kian Peng Julian (Appellant)Won	01 Oct 2020	Ong Kian Peng Julian (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed. The appellant shall have judgment for his claim in libel and damages are to be assessed by the District Court. I shall also grant the appellant an injunction restraining the respondent from publishing or causing to be published the offending words or other words similarly defamatory of him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Jeyaretnam v Malayaperumal: Constructive Trusts & Equitable Lien on HDB Flat 29 Aug 2019 Ruhunadevi Daphne Inparani A Joshua (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Aug 2019	Ruhunadevi Daphne Inparani A Joshua (Plaintiff): Equitable lien imposedEquitable lien imposed on the HDB flat for $329,812.55 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).