Mark Tan Chai Ming

Mark Tan Chai Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marine Engineering	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Validity of arbitral award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Tan Chai Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Tan Chai Ming has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	U-Hin Manufacturing v BT Engineering: Dispute over Unpaid Invoices for Vessel Construction(Aug 2010)
JLC Advisors LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Prometheus Marine v King: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Yacht Defects(Feb 2017)
Asia Practice LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	The “Turtle Bay”: Court Refuses to Sanction Private Sale of Arrested Vessels(Aug 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Tan Chai Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Tan Chai Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	243,029.51	121,514.762 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Prometheus Marine v King: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Yacht Defects 26 Feb 2017 Ann Rita King (Defendant, Claimant)Won	26 Feb 2017	Ann Rita King (Defendant, Claimant): Applications dismissedApplications to set aside the arbitral award were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	The “Turtle Bay”: Court Refuses to Sanction Private Sale of Arrested Vessels 29 Aug 2013 Bank (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Aug 2013	Bank (Plaintiff): Sanction Applications dismissedThe Bank's applications to sanction the Direct Private Sale of the Vessels as an admiralty judicial sale were refused.
3	U-Hin Manufacturing v BT Engineering: Dispute over Unpaid Invoices for Vessel Construction 17 Aug 2010 BGL Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Aug 2010	BGL Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment on CounterclaimJudgment for $80,000 in favour of the second defendant only (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).