Mark Teng

Mark Teng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and infringement. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Teng has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and copyrights.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Authorship	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Subject matter	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Compilations	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Teng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone Directories(Apr 2017) Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement, Telephone Directories, Originality(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Teng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Teng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone Directories 18 Apr 2017 Promedia Directories Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant)Won	18 Apr 2017	Promedia Directories Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant): Counterclaim AllowedPromedia succeeded on its counterclaim for groundless threat of copyright infringement, with damages to be assessed. This was reversed on appeal.
2	Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement, Telephone Directories, Originality 27 Jan 2016 Promedia Directories Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2016	Promedia Directories Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for groundless threats of copyright infringement was allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).