Marshall Lim

Marshall Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Marshall Lim has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and child abuse and neglect.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marshall Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Marshall Lim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BDB: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt and Ill-treatment of Child(Oct 2016) Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor: Reopening Concluded Criminal Appeals and Finality of Judgments(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Marshall Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Marshall Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Other	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Other: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v BDB: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt and Ill-treatment of Child 09 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Other	09 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal filed against the sentenceThe Public Prosecutor filed a Notice of Appeal against the sentence.
2	Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor: Reopening Concluded Criminal Appeals and Finality of Judgments 04 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the Prosecution's appeal and maintained the death sentence.