Martin Roderick Edward

Martin Roderick Edward is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and resulting trusts. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Presumptions against	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage of Personal Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-recourse Loan Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation of Loss	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Martin Roderick Edward has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Ng Kong Yeam v Kay Swee Pin: Resulting Trusts & Presumptions Against Gifts(Jun 2020)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Qilin World Capital Ltd v CPIT Investments Ltd: Breach of Contract & Mortgage of Personal Property Dispute(Mar 2018)
Martin & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Tan Juay Pah v Kimly Construction: Tower Crane Collapse & Negligence(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Martin Roderick Edward's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Martin Roderick Edward's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Kong Yeam v Kay Swee Pin: Resulting Trusts & Presumptions Against Gifts 07 Jun 2020 Ng Kong Yeam @ Woo Kwang Yean (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	07 Jun 2020	Ng Kong Yeam @ Woo Kwang Yean (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that the presumption of resulting trust was rebutted and the contractual claim was invalid.
2	Qilin World Capital Ltd v CPIT Investments Ltd: Breach of Contract & Mortgage of Personal Property Dispute 05 Mar 2018 QILIN WORLD CAPITAL LTD (Appellant, Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2018	QILIN WORLD CAPITAL LTD (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedQilin's appeal against the orders made by Ramsey IJ was allowed.
3	Tan Juay Pah v Kimly Construction: Tower Crane Collapse & Negligence 01 Mar 2012 Lee Tong Boon trading as Rango Machinery Services (Respondent)Lost	01 Mar 2012	Lee Tong Boon trading as Rango Machinery Services (Respondent): Indemnity Claim DismissedRango's claim for indemnity against TJP was dismissed.