Martin Roderick Edward SC

Martin Roderick Edward SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in gifts law and costs.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rules of Court 2021	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Martin Roderick Edward SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Martin Roderick Edward SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Kong Yeam v Kay Swee Pin: Resulting Trust, Share Transfer & Mental Capacity(Sep 2019) Qilin World Capital Ltd v CPIT Investments Ltd: Costs Dispute in Loan Agreement Breach(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Martin Roderick Edward SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Martin Roderick Edward SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Kong Yeam v Kay Swee Pin: Resulting Trust, Share Transfer & Mental Capacity 17 Sep 2019 Ng Kong Yeam (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Sep 2019	Ng Kong Yeam (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims in resulting trust, presumption of resulting trust, and breach of contract were dismissed.
2	Qilin World Capital Ltd v CPIT Investments Ltd: Costs Dispute in Loan Agreement Breach 10 Jul 2018 QILIN WORLD CAPITAL LTD (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	10 Jul 2018	QILIN WORLD CAPITAL LTD (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with respect to costs. The court ordered CPIT to pay Qilin its costs of S$170,000 for CA 126 and CA 145, its costs of S$534,000 for the proceedings at first instance, and its disbursements of S$106,622.26 for the proceedings at first instance excluding Qilin’s claim for legal fees in relation to advice on Hong Kong law. The court also ordered CPIT to pay Qilin’s reasonable disbursements, to be taxed if not agreed, in relation to CA 126, CA 145, and Qilin’s claim for legal fees in relation to advice on Hong Kong law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.