Mary-Anne Chua

Mary-Anne Chua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mary-Anne Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mary-Anne Chua has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders(Oct 2020) Centaurea International Pte Ltd v Citus Trading Pte Ltd: Validation of Payments under Companies Act s 259(Nov 2016) The “URSUS”: Stay of In Personam Proceedings Pending Arbitration(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mary-Anne Chua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mary-Anne Chua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders 08 Oct 2020 Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Oct 2020	Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs and disbursements in the total sum of $30,000 to be paid by the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Centaurea International Pte Ltd v Citus Trading Pte Ltd: Validation of Payments under Companies Act s 259 30 Nov 2016 Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Nov 2016	Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Payments ValidatedThe payments made to the defendant were validated (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	The “URSUS”: Stay of In Personam Proceedings Pending Arbitration 05 Apr 2015 Harms Bergung, Transport und Heavylift GmbH & Co KG (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2015	Harms Bergung, Transport und Heavylift GmbH & Co KG (Plaintiff): Prayer to dismiss the suits was dismissed; prayer for proceedings to be stayed pending arbitration was granted in partPrayer to dismiss the suits was dismissed; prayer for proceedings to be stayed pending arbitration was granted in part by ordering a stay of the in personam aspects of the Suits. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.