Mary Edmonds

Mary Edmonds is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and maintenance. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mary Edmonds has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in syariah law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Syariah Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mary Edmonds has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mary Edmonds has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chiang Wee & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Chaytor v Zaleha: Maintenance for Muslim Wife After Talak Pronouncement Under Women's Charter(Mar 2001) Zaleha Bte Rahman v Chaytor: Appeal Against Maintenance Order - Women's Charter & Supreme Court of Judicature Act(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mary Edmonds's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mary Edmonds's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chaytor v Zaleha: Maintenance for Muslim Wife After Talak Pronouncement Under Women's Charter 22 Mar 2001 Zaleha bte A Rahman (Respondent)Won	22 Mar 2001	Zaleha bte A Rahman (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision of the district judge was dismissed in her favor.
2	Zaleha Bte Rahman v Chaytor: Appeal Against Maintenance Order - Women's Charter & Supreme Court of Judicature Act 13 Nov 2000 Zaleha Bte Rahman (Appellant)Won	13 Nov 2000	Zaleha Bte Rahman (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the wife should be allowed to refile her rejected notice of appeal and prosecute the appeal in accordance with the Rules. Order on costs below is cancelled. Respondent (husband) shall pay $500 for the costs below and $500 for the costs of appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.