Mary Ong

Mary Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mary Ong has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and divorce.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Divorce	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alienation of Affections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
CPF Nomination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mary Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mary Ong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	3 cases	43% of cases	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal on Arbitration Award & Damages Assessment(Mar 2004) Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal Against Arbitration Award Leave(Oct 2003) United Engineers v Northern Elevator: Appeal of Arbitration Award on Damages for Defective Lifts(Jul 2003)
Mary Ong & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	AEH v AEI: Application for Leave to File Certificate of Final Judgment (Divorce)(Oct 2015) Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance(Apr 2007)
Mary Ong & Company	2 cases	29% of cases	ABW v ABV: Child Custody Dispute Over Care and Control Post-Divorce(Feb 2014) Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah: Division of Matrimonial Assets under Women's Charter(Oct 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mary Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mary Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,500.00	1,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AEH v AEI: Application for Leave to File Certificate of Final Judgment (Divorce) 01 Oct 2015 AEI (Respondent, Wife)Lost	01 Oct 2015	AEI (Respondent, Wife): Application opposedWife opposed the application based on concerns regarding the welfare of the children, but the court ultimately granted leave.
2	ABW v ABV: Child Custody Dispute Over Care and Control Post-Divorce 18 Feb 2014 ABW (Plaintiff)Won	18 Feb 2014	ABW (Plaintiff): Care and control grantedCare and control of the children was granted to the plaintiff.
3	Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 09 Apr 2007 Koh Bee Choo (Appellant)Partial	09 Apr 2007	Koh Bee Choo (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, with variations to the orders regarding the sale of the Parc Palais flat, maintenance, and the assignment of insurance policies.
4	Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah: Division of Matrimonial Assets under Women's Charter 02 Oct 2006 Koh Bee Choo (Petitioner)Partial	02 Oct 2006	Koh Bee Choo (Petitioner): Orders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenance.Orders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenance. Husband to pay costs fixed at $3,500 to the Wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal on Arbitration Award & Damages Assessment 25 Mar 2004 Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Won	25 Mar 2004	Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the granting of leave to appeal against an arbitration award was allowed.
6	Northern Elevator v United Engineers: Appeal Against Arbitration Award Leave 09 Oct 2003 United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2003	United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application allowedApplication to set aside the notice of appeal was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	United Engineers v Northern Elevator: Appeal of Arbitration Award on Damages for Defective Lifts 24 Jul 2003 Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Lost	24 Jul 2003	Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against orders was dismissed.