Matthew Tan Jun Ye

Matthew Tan Jun Ye is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial management and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in judicial management and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Judicial Management	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Matthew Tan Jun Ye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Matthew Tan Jun Ye has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aquinas Law Alliance LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition(Jan 2025) Re Boldtek Holdings Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application Under IRDA(Apr 2024) Re Logistics Construction: Judicial Management, Competing Nominations for Interim Judicial Manager(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Matthew Tan Jun Ye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.8 parties avg	3.8	67%
Won	29.5 parties avg	9.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Matthew Tan Jun Ye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,000.00	9,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition 26 Jan 2025 Peng Yuguo (Defendant)Lost	26 Jan 2025	Peng Yuguo (Defendant): Liable in the tort of deceitDefendant found liable in the tort of deceit and is jointly and severally liable for the sums awarded to the claimant.
2	Re Boldtek Holdings Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application Under IRDA 07 Apr 2024 Boldtek Holdings Limited (Applicant)Won	07 Apr 2024	Boldtek Holdings Limited (Applicant): Judicial management order grantedThe court granted the application for a judicial management order.
3	Re Logistics Construction: Judicial Management, Competing Nominations for Interim Judicial Manager 03 Mar 2024 Logistics Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	03 Mar 2024	Logistics Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe applicant's application to be placed under judicial management is allowed.
4	JE Synergy Engineering v Sinohydro: SOPA Adjudication Dispute Involving Alleged Fraud and Corruption 28 Dec 2023 JE Synergy Engineering Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	28 Dec 2023	JE Synergy Engineering Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissedClaimant's application to set aside the adjudication determinations and stay their enforcement was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
5	JE Synergy Engineering v Niu Ji Wei: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 04 Oct 2023 JE Synergy Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	04 Oct 2023	JE Synergy Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; JE Synergy Engineering Pte Ltd to pay Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) S$18,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 11 Oct 2022 Peng Yuguo (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	11 Oct 2022	Peng Yuguo (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against declining to set aside the service out of jurisdiction orders or to stay the proceedings in respect of the second defendant was dismissed.