Maurice Cheong

Maurice Cheong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and intellectual property law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Maurice Cheong has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyright Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Marine Industry	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Translation Service Business	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Breach	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Maurice Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Maurice Cheong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	2 cases	50% of cases	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties(Sep 2001) Pai Lily v Yeo Peng Hock Henry: Medical Negligence, Limitation Act, and Causation in Eye Infection Case(Mar 2001)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	25% of cases	PH Hydraulics v Intrepid Offshore: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Non-Competition Clause Dispute(Jun 2012)
Ella Cheong & G Mirandah	1 cases	25% of cases	Radcoflex v James Lim: Copyright Infringement & Breach of Contract Dispute(May 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Maurice Cheong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.4
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	50%
Neutral	119.0 parties avg	19.0	25%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	210.5 parties avg	10.5
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Maurice Cheong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	25,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PH Hydraulics v Intrepid Offshore: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Non-Competition Clause Dispute 26 Jun 2012 PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Jun 2012	PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part; statutory damages awarded in the amount of $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties 23 Sep 2001 Tan Kim San (Defendant)Neutral	23 Sep 2001	Tan Kim San (Defendant): Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.
3	Pai Lily v Yeo Peng Hock Henry: Medical Negligence, Limitation Act, and Causation in Eye Infection Case 25 Mar 2001 Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Defendant)Lost	25 Mar 2001	Yeo Peng Hock Henry (Defendant): Claim AllowedClaim allowed; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Radcoflex v James Lim: Copyright Infringement & Breach of Contract Dispute 26 May 2000 Radcoflex Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 May 2000	Radcoflex Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed due to a lack of evidence.