Melissa Kue

Melissa Kue is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and torts. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Melissa Kue has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and rylands v fletcher rule.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Rylands v Fletcher Rule	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melissa Kue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Melissa Kue has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Goh Sin Huat v Ho See Jui: Negligence, Private Nuisance, Water Leakage & Damage to Art(Jun 2012) Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim(Apr 2011) Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Melissa Kue's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.6
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	36.6 parties avg	6.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Melissa Kue's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Sin Huat v Ho See Jui: Negligence, Private Nuisance, Water Leakage & Damage to Art 25 Jun 2012 Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	25 Jun 2012	Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment in favour of Ho See JuiJudgment in favour of Ho See Jui with costs to be borne by Liquid Advertising and the appellant. The Judge ordered that liability between Liquid Advertising and the appellant be apportioned in the following proportions: 30% to be borne by Liquid Advertising and 70% to be borne by the appellant.
2	Ho See Jui v Liquid Advertising: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher in Water Damage Claim 28 Apr 2011 Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2011	Ho See Jui (trading as Xuanhua Art Gallery) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake 02 May 2010 Seventh defendant (Respondent, Defendant)Won	02 May 2010	Seventh defendant (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.