Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming

Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Hospitality Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	50% of cases	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption(Apr 2012) Hendricks v Shangri-La: Hotel Liability for Lost Ring & Innkeepers Act(Oct 2011)
Advocatus Law LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2019)
Eugene Thuraisingam	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Adverse Inference(Mar 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	75%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mervyn Cheong Jun Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAzli was found guilty of abetment by intentionally aiding Roszaidi to traffic diamorphine.
2	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Adverse Inference 10 Mar 2015 Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Respondent)Partial	10 Mar 2015	Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop (Respondent): Convicted on Amended ChargeThe respondent was convicted on the amended charge of possessing 249.99g of Ice for the purpose of trafficking.
3	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 03 Apr 2012 Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Appellant)Lost	03 Apr 2012	Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for importing diamorphine was dismissed.
4	Hendricks v Shangri-La: Hotel Liability for Lost Ring & Innkeepers Act 24 Oct 2011 Bass Anne Hendricks (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Oct 2011	Bass Anne Hendricks (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.