Mervyn Tan

Mervyn Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mervyn Tan has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mervyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mervyn Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Anthony Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Soon Kim v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt by Fire & Sentencing Appeal(Oct 2019) Tan Wei v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Excessive Sentence for Trade Marks Act Offence(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mervyn Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mervyn Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Soon Kim v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt by Fire & Sentencing Appeal 16 Oct 2019 Ng Soon Kim (Appellant)Partial	16 Oct 2019	Ng Soon Kim (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partSentence of 14 months’ imprisonment set aside and a sentence of seven months’ imprisonment imposed in its place. Term of disqualification reduced from 18 months to nine months.
2	Tan Wei v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Excessive Sentence for Trade Marks Act Offence 19 Apr 2016 Tan Wei (Appellant)Won	19 Apr 2016	Tan Wei (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the aggregate sentence was reduced from 14 months to 9 months.