Meryl Koh Junning

Meryl Koh Junning is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in undue influence and patents. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and undue influence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Meryl Koh Junning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Meryl Koh Junning has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Oon Swee Gek v Violet Oon Inc: Share Valuation & Costs in Oppression Claim(Jul 2024) Oon Swee Gek v Violet Oon Inc: Oppression, Economic Duress & Undue Influence in Shareholders' Agreement Dispute(Jan 2024) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Meryl Koh Junning's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Meryl Koh Junning's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	897,000.00	299,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oon Swee Gek v Violet Oon Inc: Share Valuation & Costs in Oppression Claim 02 Jul 2024 Tay Yiming (Claimant)Won	02 Jul 2024	Tay Yiming (Claimant): Costs awardedClaimant awarded costs of $299,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Oon Swee Gek v Violet Oon Inc: Oppression, Economic Duress & Undue Influence in Shareholders' Agreement Dispute 18 Jan 2024 Tay Yiming (Claimant)Won	18 Jan 2024	Tay Yiming (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for Claimant; the 2019 Agreements were set aside and the defendants were ordered to sell their shares to the claimants at fair value (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 21 Jul 2020 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Jul 2020	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim that SG 872 and SG 508 were invalid was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement 06 Feb 2020 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	06 Feb 2020	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partSG 508 found invalid and not infringed.