Michael Anthony Palmer

Michael Anthony Palmer is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Anthony Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Anthony Palmer has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Ace Class Precision Engineering Pte Ltd v Tan Boon Hwa: Liquidator Removal & Property Delivery Dispute(Jun 2021) Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Anthony Palmer's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	212.5 parties avg	12.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	212.5 parties avg	12.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Anthony Palmer's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	9,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ace Class Precision Engineering Pte Ltd v Tan Boon Hwa: Liquidator Removal & Property Delivery Dispute 02 Jun 2021 Liquidators of Apex Precision Engineering Pte Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) (Applicant)Won	02 Jun 2021	Liquidators of Apex Precision Engineering Pte Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) (Applicant): Application GrantedLiquidators' application for the respondents to comply with the October 2020 Orders was granted. The respondents were ordered to pay the liquidators costs fixed at $3,000 (plus disbursements) in respect of SUM 310, SUM 303 and SUM 330. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance 11 Mar 2021 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Mar 2021	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court ruled in favor of CSAPL, finding that it had used its best efforts to ensure the director's attendance at board meetings and was therefore not in breach of the Deed of Undertaking.