Michael Eu

Michael Eu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and insurance. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Eu has demonstrated expertise across 54 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contribution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fire Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Court Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stevedoring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third Party Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bonus Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right of subrogation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Eu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Eu has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
United Legal Alliance LLC	7 cases	58% of cases	DNKH Logistics Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd: Fire Insurance Policy Coverage Dispute(Aug 2018) Miah Rasel v 5 Ways Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Contributory Negligence in Construction Accident(Sep 2017) Kay Lim v Soon Douglas: Implied Terms, Indemnity Clauses & Crane Dismantling Negligence(Sep 2012)
ComLaw LLC	4 cases	33% of cases	Econ Piling v Aviva & JTC: Performance Bond Call After Limitation Period(May 2006) QBE Insurance v Winterthur Insurance: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in Double Insurance Claim(Jan 2005) Schuler v New Era of Networks: Wrongful Dismissal & Bonus Dispute(Sep 2002)
United Legal Alliance	1 cases	8% of cases	Tan Beow Hiong v Tan Boon Aik: Contempt of Court, Committal Order, Matrimonial Assets(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Eu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.3 parties avg	2.3	58%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Eu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,500.00	785.717 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DNKH Logistics Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd: Fire Insurance Policy Coverage Dispute 23 Aug 2018 Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2018	Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonCosts of $5500 inclusive of disbursements ordered in favor of Liberty Insurance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Miah Rasel v 5 Ways Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Contributory Negligence in Construction Accident 26 Sep 2017 5 Ways Engineering Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	26 Sep 2017	5 Ways Engineering Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liability EstablishedDefendant found liable for negligence, but damages reduced due to Plaintiff's contributory negligence. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Kay Lim v Soon Douglas: Implied Terms, Indemnity Clauses & Crane Dismantling Negligence 09 Sep 2012 Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Sep 2012	Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chiu Teng Enterprises v Attorney-General: Specific Discovery, Official Communications Privilege 30 Mar 2011 Chiu Teng Enterprises Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	30 Mar 2011	Chiu Teng Enterprises Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for specific discovery was dismissed. Costs of $1,200 awarded to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Beow Hiong v Tan Boon Aik: Contempt of Court, Committal Order, Matrimonial Assets 03 Aug 2010 Tan Boon Aik (Petitioner, Respondent)Lost	03 Aug 2010	Tan Boon Aik (Petitioner, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partThe High Court quashed the warrant for committal and set aside the 30-day sentence.
6	Chandran v Dockers Marine: Stevedore's Liability for Injury on Vessel under Factories Act & Common Law Duty of Care 05 May 2009 Dockers Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	05 May 2009	Dockers Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant, Dockers Marine Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Hao Wei (S) Pte Ltd v Rasan Selvan: Employer's Duty of Care and Workplace Safety 04 Sep 2008 Hao Wei (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Sep 2008	Hao Wei (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
8	Econ Piling v Aviva: Performance Bond Call Validity After Time-Barred Contract Claims 11 Sep 2006 Aviva General Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	11 Sep 2006	Aviva General Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): NeutralAviva took a neutral stance, stating it would abide by the court's decision.
9	Econ Piling v Aviva & JTC: Performance Bond Call After Limitation Period 07 May 2006 Aviva General Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 May 2006	Aviva General Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, setting aside the injunction order that restrained Aviva General Insurance Pte Ltd from making payment under the performance bond.
10	QBE Insurance v Winterthur Insurance: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in Double Insurance Claim 23 Jan 2005 QBE Insurance (International) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jan 2005	QBE Insurance (International) Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedQBE's application was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
11	Schuler v New Era of Networks: Wrongful Dismissal & Bonus Dispute 18 Sep 2002 Christian Schuler (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Sep 2002	Christian Schuler (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claims for wrongful dismissal and unpaid bonuses were dismissed.
12	Hartford Insurance v Chiu Teng: Third Party Rights Against Insurers & Indemnity 23 Jan 2002 Chiu Teng Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2002	Chiu Teng Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedChiu Teng prevailed in defending the appeal and was awarded costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).