Michael Palmer

Michael Palmer is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in money and moneylenders and trademarks. Their track record shows a 39.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 44% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Palmer has demonstrated expertise across 72 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reopening of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest Rates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Margin Facility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Software Piracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Palmer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Palmer has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	8 cases	44% of cases	Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Opposition Based on Earlier Trade Mark(May 2010) Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings(Mar 2008) Koh Keow Neo v Chee Johnny: Privatisation of HUDC Estate Dispute(May 2004)
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	6 cases	33% of cases	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability(Mar 2023) Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause(Mar 2020) Evan Lim v MWA Capital: Reopening Loan Transactions under Moneylenders Act(Nov 2018)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	3 cases	17% of cases	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy(Oct 2012) Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Registration Dispute(Feb 2011) ANB v ANF: Defamation, O 14 r 12, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Justification Defence(Nov 2010)
Quahe Woo and Palmer LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Property Sale, HDB Approval & Contract Rescission(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Palmer's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.2
Complex Cases: 8 (44%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	6%
Lost	64.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	6%
Partial	36.3 parties avg	6.3	17%
Won	77.2 parties avg	7.2	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2001	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Palmer's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	6(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(17%)	17%
Won	7(39%)	39%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,550,070.53	394,452.289 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability 30 Mar 2023 Qing Lian Precision Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	30 Mar 2023	Qing Lian Precision Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Qing Lian Precision Pte Ltd are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause 03 Mar 2020 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 Mar 2020	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for stay of proceedings granted in partThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.
3	Evan Lim v MWA Capital: Reopening Loan Transactions under Moneylenders Act 12 Nov 2018 Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2018	Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $38,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation). Costs of the Liquidators’ joinder application fixed at $10,000 (both inclusive of disbursements) in favour of the Liquidators. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	MWA Capital Pte Ltd v Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd: Winding Up, Interest Rates & Moneylenders Act 29 Aug 2017 Gary Loh Weng Fatt (Liquidators)Neutral	29 Aug 2017	Gary Loh Weng Fatt (Liquidators): Decision affirmedLiquidators' decision to affirm MWA's interest rates was upheld.
5	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Property Sale, HDB Approval & Contract Rescission 08 Apr 2015 The One Suites Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	08 Apr 2015	The One Suites Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; Appellant entitled to recover $1.68m deposit. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Rescission of Property Purchase Due to HDB Approval Refusal 16 Sep 2014 The One Suites Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Purchaser)Lost	16 Sep 2014	The One Suites Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Purchaser): Claim DismissedThe Purchaser's claim for the refund of the deposit was dismissed.
7	Bank of East Asia v Quah Su-Ling: Summary Judgment and Stay Application in Share Margin Facility Dispute 27 Mar 2014 Quah Su-Ling (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Mar 2014	Quah Su-Ling (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the summary judgment and stay application was dismissed. Judgment for the sum of S$1,832,070.53 as at 2 December 2013, and default interest on that sum at the rate of the plaintiff’s prevailing prime lending rate plus 6% per annum from 3 December 2013 until the date of payment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 William Tan (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	William Tan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartWilliam Tan's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
9	Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Registration Dispute 27 Feb 2011 Nike International Ltd (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2011	Nike International Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedNike International's application for registration was rejected.
10	ANB v ANF: Defamation, O 14 r 12, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Justification Defence 02 Nov 2010 ANF (Defendant)Won	02 Nov 2010	ANF (Defendant): Appeal allowedThe defendant’s appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s determination on meaning of the Article was allowed.
11	Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Opposition Based on Earlier Trade Mark 04 May 2010 Nike International Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 May 2010	Nike International Ltd (Respondent): Application allowedNike's application to register the trademark was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings 23 Mar 2008 Republic of the Philippines (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2008	Republic of the Philippines (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Koh Keow Neo v Chee Johnny: Privatisation of HUDC Estate Dispute 05 May 2004 Ling Chwee Seng (Defendant)Won	05 May 2004	Ling Chwee Seng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Nganthavee Teriya v Ang Yee Lim: Striking Out Third Party Proceedings for Lack of Cause of Action 09 Apr 2003 Tan Leong Ko William (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2003	Tan Leong Ko William (Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against striking out the third party claim was dismissed.
15	BNP Paribas v Polynesia Timber: Substituted Service & Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Debt Recovery 25 Mar 2002 Philip Ling Lee King (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	25 Mar 2002	Philip Ling Lee King (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe second defendant’s appeal vide CA 600150 of 2001 was dismissed on 24 July 2002.
16	SM Summit v Microsoft: Discovery of Documents in Defamation Claim for Software Piracy 14 May 2001 Lee Cross (Defendant)Won	14 May 2001	Lee Cross (Defendant): Discovery application allowedDefendants' applications for discovery allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Richard Ang v Singapore Turf Club: Interim Injunction Against Disqualification 22 Sep 2000 Singapore Turf Club (Defendant)Won	22 Sep 2000	Singapore Turf Club (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction.
18	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).