Michelle Neo

Michelle Neo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and investment advice.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michelle Neo has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Assurance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michelle Neo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Breach of Duty in Investment Advice Claim(Feb 2015) Lee Pei-Ru Alice v Airtrust: Oral Assurances & Investment Repayment Dispute(Nov 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michelle Neo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michelle Neo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,294,750.00	1,294,750.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Breach of Duty in Investment Advice Claim 25 Feb 2015 Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2015	Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Defendant's appeal to strike out the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
2	Lee Pei-Ru Alice v Airtrust: Oral Assurances & Investment Repayment Dispute 24 Nov 2013 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Nov 2013	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court ordered the defendant to repay the plaintiffs the amounts of S$431,750 and S$863,000, with interest thereon from the date of the writ (Singapore Dollars).