Michelle Tang Hui Ming

Michelle Tang Hui Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in resulting trusts and trusts and estates.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Financial contribution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michelle Tang Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michelle Tang Hui Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nakoorsha Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Oct 2024) Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Equitable Accounting, Co-owned Property, Mortgage Loan Repayments(Jul 2024) Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Constructive & Resulting Trusts in Property Purchase(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michelle Tang Hui Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michelle Tang Hui Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	54,000.00	18,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 09 Oct 2024 Lee Cheng Ling (Applicant)Lost	09 Oct 2024	Lee Cheng Ling (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; ordered to bear costs of $34,000 jointly and severally with Mr. Lim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Equitable Accounting, Co-owned Property, Mortgage Loan Repayments 16 Jul 2024 Khoo Jee Chek (Appellant)Partial	16 Jul 2024	Khoo Jee Chek (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Mr. Khoo awarded costs of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Constructive & Resulting Trusts in Property Purchase 22 Aug 2023 Khoo Jee Chek (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Aug 2023	Khoo Jee Chek (Plaintiff): PartialThe court determined that Khoo held 38.38% of the beneficial interest in the Property. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.